Tiktok as a traffic...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Tiktok as a traffic source, how many times are you posting daily?

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
934 Views
James Campbell
(@aldesylcen)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 51
Topic starter  
For anyone who creates content on Tiktok as a traffic source, how many times are you posting daily? I was posting 1x per day and getting a lot of views/good engagement. I recently ramped up to posting 3x per day, and it seems that every video I post is not getting anywhere near the views of my other videos. Has this happened to anyone else?
 
 
 
 

   
Quote
Topic Tags
Nate Olsen
(@nateolsen)
Reputable Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 277
 
Yes, what happens most of the time is when we target to post more than 2 times a day, we end up compromising the quality of the content.
It is paramount to one's success online that they don't compromise the content in terms of its quality and value.
As long as you're not compromising the quality, views should not be affected. BUT, if you think you are being too hard on yourself by posting 3 times a day, yu might wanna focus on quality rather than quantity!
Hope it helps!

   
ReplyQuote
Nate Olsen
(@nateolsen)
Reputable Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 277
 

Quality over quantity!

 


   
ReplyQuote
James Campbell
(@aldesylcen)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 51
Topic starter  

Thank you, very helpful. I do think that could be true for some of my newer content. I did also come to the realization that a big chunk of my traffic was from one somewhat viral video that kept people coming back to my page and is no longer being shown on the for you page. Thanks again


   
ReplyQuote
(@melaniemachts)
Active Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 9
 

@nateolsen But I also heard, that apart from the quality of the content, TikTok has some algorithms, that make your videos automatically less visible if you post too often a day. Is that right? Because I'm not too sure about that.

regards.

Melanie


   
ReplyQuote
Share: